Kerala High Court: Power to Add Charges Remains With Court, Can’t be Done at Behest of Parties || Allahabad High Court: Can’t Allow Petition for Expeditious Disposal of Cases on Regular Basis || SC: Can’t Consider Payment of Compensation A Factor to Reduce Sentence of Convict || SC: No Need for PMLA Acc. to Fulfill S. 45 Conditions When Furnis. Bond After Appearing Before Court || Plea to Terminate 30 Weeks Pregnancy Dismissed, SC Talks About Right to Life of Child in Womb || Supreme Court: Written Grounds of Arrest Must be Given to the Accused in UAPA Cases Too || Supreme Court: Difference Between ‘Reasons of Arrest’ and ‘Grounds of Arrest’ Stated || All HC: No Bar on Anticipa. Bail to Accused Booked u/s 376(3) IPC through UP Amend. to S. 438 CrPC || NCDRC Cautioned by Supreme Court: Hierarchy of Judiciary Must Be Respected || Supreme Court: Cannot Allow Wrong Doers to Make Profit Out of Their Own Wrongs

Search Results for Tag : erstwhile rulers

News

Supreme Court Rules, Income from Palace Rents Not Taxable Under IT Law(06.12.2016)

Supreme Court has held that income earned by erstwhile rulers of a princely state or their heirs by renting out a portion of residential palace was no.....

Tags : Supreme Court, erstwhile rulers, princely state, residential palace, Income Tax

SC: Erstwhile Rulers Need Not Pay Tax On Income From Leasing Palaces(13.12.2016)

Supreme Court has held that Erstwhile rulers are not required to pay tax on income earned by letting out a portion of their residential palace.

Tags : Supreme Court, Erstwhile rulers, residential palace, income tax